What is the result of random error in measurement?

Prepare for the WHEBP Standardized Tests and Measurements Test with detailed questions, hints, and explanations. Enhance your readiness and confidence for exam day!

Multiple Choice

What is the result of random error in measurement?

Explanation:
Random error in measurement refers to the unpredictable fluctuations that occur when measuring a variable, which can stem from various uncontrollable factors. The essence of random error is that it introduces variability in the results, but this variability does not follow a consistent pattern. This means that, unlike systematic errors that might consistently push results in one direction, random errors can cause measurements to be too high or too low in an erratic manner. These errors arise from chance factors that affect the measurement process, such as slight variations in the measurement instruments, environmental conditions, and the observer's judgment. In the context of the other choices, saying that random error consistently skews results in one direction is misleading because that describes systematic error, not random error. Additionally, while recalibration may help improve measuring instruments and reduce systematic biases, it does not address the inherent unpredictability of random errors, which are typically more challenging to correct. Lastly, random errors do not lead to more reliable outcomes; instead, they create uncertainty in the data collected, making reliability more difficult to achieve. Thus, the introduction of variability without a discernible pattern accurately captures the nature of random error in measurements.

Random error in measurement refers to the unpredictable fluctuations that occur when measuring a variable, which can stem from various uncontrollable factors. The essence of random error is that it introduces variability in the results, but this variability does not follow a consistent pattern.

This means that, unlike systematic errors that might consistently push results in one direction, random errors can cause measurements to be too high or too low in an erratic manner. These errors arise from chance factors that affect the measurement process, such as slight variations in the measurement instruments, environmental conditions, and the observer's judgment.

In the context of the other choices, saying that random error consistently skews results in one direction is misleading because that describes systematic error, not random error. Additionally, while recalibration may help improve measuring instruments and reduce systematic biases, it does not address the inherent unpredictability of random errors, which are typically more challenging to correct. Lastly, random errors do not lead to more reliable outcomes; instead, they create uncertainty in the data collected, making reliability more difficult to achieve. Thus, the introduction of variability without a discernible pattern accurately captures the nature of random error in measurements.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy